These problems are caused by the United States, the pot we do not back china!

The United States China problems Syria

mierjunshi· 2017-01-07 22:50:37

a few days ago, I saw an article on the world wide web, there is a saying: "China is the biggest beneficiary of globalization, but the vast majority of the country is a victim of globalization. Globalization intensifies the polarization of the two levels of international and domestic, so the social forces of anti globalization in developed and developing countries. Because of globalization, developed countries and developing countries between the South and the north south south and north to weaken, conflict conflict increased, and at the same time in two international and domestic levels, such as the civil war in Syria and the UK back in Europe are both domestic and international conflicts and conflict. "

the above statement Chinese in most of the countries of the north south south facade, conflict and conflict rise as a result of globalisation, the implication is the civil war in Syria and the UK" back in Europe "etc. these conflicts and confusion of the pot to make globalization even China come back, and understanding of this argument is wrong these problems! This is caused by the United States, we China pot back!"

"that view is wrong, so only to see the partial and surface, a conclusion is specious, very deceptive. This argument ignores the current international political and economic order in the new and old, but still the old international political and economic order dominated by the reality. The old international political and economic order is in the right position in the case of developing countries, in accordance with the developed capitalist countries and will need to be set up, its main contents and characteristics are: unreasonable division of labor based on the international production system, not equivalent to the exchange for the characteristics of the international trading system, to occupy the international monopoly capital the dominance of the international financial system, as well as by the international institutions of developed countries to control the economy of the minority, namely the capitalism monopoly, in the field of international production and distribution. In other words, is the United States in the international political and economic order Global hegemony under the concept of financial settlement. In September 21, 1988, Deng Xiaoping proposed the establishment of a new international political order, the content is all countries should respect each other, mutual consultation in politics, and should not impose their will and security should be mutual trust, mutual maintenance, foster a new security concept of mutual trust, mutual benefit, equality and cooperation, oppose all forms of hegemonism and power politics now, to upgrade to a version of the Xi greatly equality and win-win cooperation to build a new international political and economic order, the common destiny of mankind has not established successfully, of course, now is the process of alternation of old and new order.

#p#: #e#

", the old international political and economic order is dominant, the United States is still the largest beneficiary countries, because developing countries:

1, China etc. also caused by high-tech blockade of the United States and other developed countries and monopoly to reasonable division of labor based on the international production system and exploitation to unequal exchange of the international trading system, Chinese is not able to high-tech products are the price of cabbage, the United States and other developed countries also rely on high-tech blockade and monopoly in many high-tech products to developing countries such as Chinese exploitation, from Chinese developing countries such as the working people and the sweat. The old international political and economic order is caused by the vast majority of the country is the victim's main cause of globalization and the development of the wool Chinese! No! Chinese put a lot of high-tech products the price of cabbage just reduce the exploitation of the Chinese countries such as the United States and other developed countries, but developing countries benefit from the price of cabbage in China only! Let the exploitation of China developing countries including the United States and other developed countries less. What China is the biggest beneficiary of globalization at present? China and who did not grab the cake, and rely on their own industrious and intelligent manufacturing wealth and let the United States and other developed countries exploited less, China or in the United States other developed countries rely on their own skills and exploitation! Less is the biggest beneficiary of the exploitation and exploitation of other countries? That has been Globalization The biggest beneficiary of the United States they cannot see, what the glasses with?

#p# #e#

2", now the international financial system or in the U.S. as the main trade and settlement currency, the United States still enjoy the world collect seigniorage seigniorage bonuses. Is the difference between the currency casting cost below its nominal value of. It takes the printed dollar cost is very low, and the dollar has the world itself out of the purchasing power of American goods production without collateral, can only print dollars for other countries goods, such as printing $100 to $1 cost of the seigniorage is $99. For example, we want to buy a ton of salmon from the hands of Holland, people can not accept RMB ah, only $assumption is $5000; we do not have, and not India, we can only get 20000 pounds of rice (or other things to sell for $5000) and the United States for $5000 back. For the United States, because the Indian $5000, only to pay the cost of $50, equivalent to take $50 for our 20000 pounds of rice back. You say the United States is not making big
The lastest articles of mierjunshi

The world's most brutal weapon: the first one makes people tremble

Why the Chinese do not fight for decades

The world's most brutal weapon: the first one makes people tremble

Why the Chinese do not fight for decades

The world's most brutal weapon: the first one makes people tremble

Why the Chinese do not fight for decades

The world's most brutal weapon: the first one makes people tremble

The world's most brutal weapon: the first one makes people tremble

Why the Chinese do not fight for decades

The world's most brutal weapon: the first one makes people tremble