What does South Korea promise to "do not add" to Sade?
xiakedao· 2017-11-27 08:42:26
, a few days ago, Wang Yi and foreign minister Kang Jinghe held talks at the Diaoyutai State Guest House, and the "three no" commitment by South Korea once again became the focus. The so-called "three no" commitment by
is the promise of the ROK: no additional "Sade" system, no entry into the US anti missile system, and no development of the three party military alliance between Korea, Japan and the United states. As early as the end of October, Kang Beijing and Congress in South Korea asked raised this point. At that time, due to the issue of Sade and the low tide period of Sino Korean relations, but also gradually eased.
this time, when China and South Korea established diplomatic relations 25th anniversary approaching, South Korea once again declared "three no" commitment, frequent to the Chinese side, what is the meaning behind it?
", "three no" promise, what does it mean to China?
sees the first one: promise not to add "Sade" system. At this point, we may have to go back to the performance of the Sade system. According to the introduction of military expert Li Baozhu, there are two modes of X band radar in missile system: pre warning mode and terminal fire control mode.
Li Baozhu said that the so-called pre warning, that is able to detect the missile's function, its detection distance is generally up to 1800— 2000 km. There is no doubt that this function poses a great threat to our national defense and military security. And the terminal fire control, function is mainly accurate intercept and attack the enemy missile, its guidance distance is generally 600 to 800 kilometers.
is worth mentioning that, because of the limitations of the German system itself, these two functions can not be used at the same time, that is, in the "pre warning" mode, we can not use "terminal fire control" mode, the use of the latter, you can not use the former." although these two functions are switched, but the current South Korea, compared to the "China of military action, the use of" peep "end fire control" mode, precise intercept possible missile launch, is undoubtedly the most urgent the demand.
after all, in November 21st, Trump again listed North Korea as "a country supporting terrorism", the situation in the peninsula once again tense up, South Korea still bear the brunt. At present, China does not show any aggressive military tendencies.
however, in terms of probability, it does not rule out that South Korea will take other actions, such as giving up North Korea's missiles and monitoring China as the international situation changes. However, before the "three no" commitment was made by Kang and Beijing, she also put forward a "limit", that is, the "Sade" system deployed in Korea, does not harm the strategic security interests of the Chinese side". So, don't take Sade to China, it's the bottom line for China to korea.
so, if Korea really want thad also has two functions, the best solution is to introduce second sade. But if that's the case, the "three no" promises disintegrate and cross the bottom line of china.
therefore, from the perspective of the normalization of the relationship between China and South Korea, if South Korea introduced the second Sade, it is undoubtedly the choice of the border station and the enemy of china. This bottom line is the first prerequisite for normalization of relations between China and korea. With this consensus on
, we have a good understanding of the second commitment. If Sade is in the "terminal fire control" mode for a long time, there will be no "joining the US anti missile system". The third promises of
are also of great military significance. As we all know, at present, the United States, Japan and South Korea are the military alliance, but Japan and South Korea are not military alliances. What does that mean?
if the United States bombers flew from Guam, a Japanese fighter escort only in Japanese airspace, once flew to South Korean airspace, the Japanese fighter must stop in South Korea, the fighter is connected. However, if South Korea joins the military alliance between the United States, Japan and South Korea, it means that these three countries will produce a great deal of joint action, which will pose a great threat to China's territorial and sovereignty security.
of course, the international situation is changing. As long as Sade has a certain threat to China in a day, we should continue to pay attention to it and remain vigilant.
of course, more than just from the technical level of the "three" commitment to the military significance, and behind the political significance, the same can not be underestimated.
is very sensitive to the meeting between Japan and china. "Japanese economic news" reported in November 23rd, "recently, the government is very concerned about China zaiyin". Indeed, the "three no" promises to release some goodwill to china.
so, the question is, why did you have this big reversal before you offended China and also wanted to do the Republic of Korea?
self positioning is important. We might as well assume that if South Korea continues to pursue an additional deployment of Sade, what will it reap in the international community? Whether or not willing to admit it,
has long been considered as a small shrimp in a big country". If South Korea continues to deploy thad, the development of the US South Korea alliance, the United States became a pawn, security and order in Asia Pacific will inevitably change camp. Maybe somewhere